Vaša ocena: 
Ocena 2,9 od 14 glasov
Ocenite to novico!
FBI-ju je uspelo onesposobiti vse razstrelivne naprave v stanovanju množičnega morilca v Koloradu. James Holmes je pokol načrtoval več mesecev, še vedno pa je o njem znano zelo malo.
Pripadniki ameriške zvezne policije so potrebovali celo soboto, da so v stanovanju v predmestju Denverja odstranili vse pasti in razstrelivne naprave, s katerimi je bilo prepredeno bivališče 24-letnega študenta, ki je na polnočni premieri najnovejšega filma o Batmanu ubil 12 ljudi in jih 58 ranil.
Po strelskem pokolu se je mirno vdal policistom in povedal, da je miniral svoje stanovanje. Dejal naj bi tudi, da je Joker, sovražni filmski lik Batmana.
Sam nisem še nikoli videl česa podobnega temu, kar nam kažejo fotografije stanovanja," je dejal policijski načelnik v predmestju Aurora Dan Oates, preden so pripadniki FBI-ja drugič poskusili vdreti v stanovanje, saj se je prvi poskus v petek izkazal za prenevarnega.
Pojasnil je, da je bilo stanovanje polno žic, različnih pregrad, kozarcev z naboji in kozarcev s tekočino, ki so spominjali na možnarje.
Agentje so si stanovanje ogledali s kamero in nato s pomočjo robota razstrelili eno izmed razstrelivnih naprav, da so lahko nato onesposobili še druge. "Vsak, ki bi vstopil v stanovanje, bi dobil hude rane ali pa bi umrl," je dejal agent FBI-ja James Yacone.
Holmes je zaradi svoje varnosti soboto preživel v samici, še vedno pa ni znan motiv za pokol, saj noče govoriti s policisti. V ponedeljek ga čaka prvo zaslišanje na sodišču. Obtožnica ga bo bremenila naklepnega uboja in še več drugih kaznivih dejanj, medtem ko ne more biti obtožen nezakonitega posedovanja orožja, saj je vse kupil zakonito.
Iskal stike po spletu
Oates je povedal, da je Holmes svoje dejanje natančno in skrbno načrtoval več mesecev. Po spletu je kupil orožje in 6.000 nabojev, v trgovinah z orožjem pa polavtomatsko puško, šibrovko in dve pištoli.
Njegovi starši so prek policije podali izjavo za javnost in v njej izrazili sožalje žrtvam ter prosili medije za spoštovanje zasebnosti v času, ko sodelujejo s policijo. Starši živijo v San Diegu, kjer je Holmes tudi odraščal.
Holmes sicer še vedno ostaja uganka, saj nobenemu ni jasno, zakaj se je odlični in nadarjeni študent medicine odločil za tako kruto dejanje. V času, prežetem s družabnimi spletnimi omrežji, sam ni imel znanega računa na priljubljenih Facebooku in Twitterju.
Tabloidni ameriški portal TMZ je sicer odkril njegov profil na spletni strani Adultfinder, ki je namenjena iskanju osebnih in spolnih stikov, kjer ima lase pobarvane rdeče, kot naj bi jih imel tudi v času, ko so ga po streljanju prijeli policisti. Profil si je ustvaril 5. julija in nazadnje je stran obiskal v preteklih dneh.
Malo znajo o njem povedati tudi tisti, ki so ga poznali. Njegovi sosedje povedo, da jih ni nikoli pozdravil. Lastnica stanovanja ga je opisala kot normalnega in tihega fanta, ki je redno plačeval najemnino in ni nikoli povzročal težav.
Najpogosteje ga označujejo za samotarskega in zadržanega fanta, čeprav je eden izmed njegovih kolegov na doktorskem študiju zaupal, da je imel prijatelje, tih in miren pa je bil tako kot vsi drugi študentje na doktorskem študiju, ki jim poleg študija ostane le še malo časa za druge stvari. Pred mesecem dni je sicer Holmes opustil doktorski študij nevrologije.
Obama molči glede orožja
Prizorišče pokola, žrtve in njihove svojce bo danes obiskal predsednik Barack Obama, ki se je pred izvolitvijo zavzemal za prepoved avtomatskega orožja.
A po prihodu v Belo hišo je Obama pozabil na svoje obljube in se tega vprašanja ni več dotikal, saj je to preveč občutljivo v državi, ki ima pravico do nošenja orožja zapisano v ustavi in kjer imajo prebivalci v lasti kar 300 milijonov kosov orožja.
Two days ago I asked the commonsense question, "Why didn't anyone fight back against James Holmes, the shooter who shot so many people in the Batman movie theater?"
Now the answer has become clear: Because Aurora, Colorado already has strict gun control laws on the books that make it:
Illegal to carry a concealed weapon, even if you're a law-abiding citizen.
Illegal to discharge a firearm in public unless you are a peace officer.
Thus, any person who would have shot James Holmes and stopped the massacre would, themselves, have been arrested as a criminal!
In Aurora, Colorado, it is illegal to stop a massacre
"I cannot help but think, if one person in that audience was carrying a gun with them, that person could have saved lives. Unfortunately – despite what some of the Left have said – this tragedy is an example of the importance of our Second Amendment Rights," reports Ron Meyer at CNS News.
"Crime rates alone of cities such as Chicago and Washington D.C. prove that gun bans only increase crime. The D.C. police response rate is eight minutes; most crimes are done in less than one. Gun bans create a trouble-free world for criminals considering no one can defend themselves."
As a lawful, FBI-background-checked individual with a concealed carry permit, if I had been present in the Aurora, Colorado movie theater during this shooting, I would have been arrested and charged as a felon for discharging my own firearm aimed at James Holmes. It is apparently a "crime" to defend innocent lives, protect children, stop a shooting and end a massacre in Aurora Colorado. It is a crime to protect your own children from violence.
Violent criminals now know to target Aurora, Boulder, Broomfield, Longmont and other "gun ban" cities in Colorado
According to current Colorado law, it is illegal to carry a concealed weapon in all the following cities:
Aurora, Boulder, Broomfield, Colorado Springs, Denver, Englewood, Lakewood, Littleton, Longmont, Northglenn, Pueblo, Thornton, Westminster, Wheat Ridge.
It is illegal to even OWN a large number of firearms in Thornton and Lafayette. In Aurora, it is illegal to carry a firearm in a vehicle! Thus, even driving to a movie theater with a firearm in your own car makes you a criminal.
These laws did not stop James Holmes from driving with a loaded gun in his car, along with explosives that were also found in his car. Once again, this demonstrates that gun control laws only disarm the public while allowing criminals to have "free reign" over a completely helpless public.
Here are some of the other gun control laws that already exist in Aurora.
1. "Dangerous weapon" includes firearm
2. Revocation of license for furnishing a firearm to a minor or someone under the influence.
3. Window displays cannot include firearms with barrels less than 12 inches long.
4. Unlawful to carry concealed "dangerous weapon"
5. Unlawful to discharge firearms, unless by law enforcement on duty or on shooting range.
6. Unlawful to possess firearm while under the influence of intoxicant
7. Unlawful to have loaded firearm in motor vehicle.
8. Unlawful for a juvenile to possess a firearm.
By definition criminals do not abide by such laws
Notice, again, that none of these laws stopped James Holmes. By definition criminals do not follow these laws. Thus, the only real impact of gun disarmament of the public is to create yet more victims by making sure the honest, law-abiding citizenry is completely defenseless against criminals.
So this answers my previous question of why nobody shot back. The answer is that all law-abiding citizens left their guns at home in order to "comply" with Aurora gun control laws!
This is precisely what allowed the massacre to produce such a high body count. Had just one person been in that audience with a concealed carry permit and a loaded firearm, they could have shot back and ended the massacre. The number of dead could have been sharply reduced. Lives could have been saved.
"Mass shootings can be stopped. People need to arm themselves with the facts (and with weapons). If one law-abiding person in the theater had been carrying a gun, lives could have been saved," writes Hillary Cherry at CNS News.
And she's right.
Gun disarmament really means gun concentration in the hands of government
A disarmed public is helpless against crazed shooters. But the government wants you to believe that the answer to all this is yet more gun confiscation from law-abiding citizens.
This makes about as much sense as trying to fight a fire by throwing gasoline on it. If the reality is that police can't protect you and that honest, law-abiding citizens are forced to leave all their guns at home, then how are violent criminals (who ignore laws, of course) supposed to be stopped by forcing even more restrictive gun control laws onto the victims themselves?
The Aurora, Colorado shooting victims died in their seats because they could not shoot back. Now, Obama, Bloomberg and others want to actually promote those same victim conditions across the entire nation, practically ensuring more violent crime takes place against a disarmed and helpless public.
Washington D.C., it seems, will not be satisfied until we are all placed in the same seats under which the victims of Aurora, Colorado helplessly died. We are all to be made powerless, defenseless and totally dependent on government employees with guns (i.e. police) instead of having the right to defend our own families against random acts of sudden violence.
Now it all makes sense: Aurora, Denver and Boulder will be the perfect targets for future massacres because violent criminals who want to kill as many people as possible are smart enough to understand their odds are better when nobody can shoot back.
This is why Hitler disarmed the Jews, of course, before sending them to the gas chambers. It's so much easier to load people onto railroad cars at gunpoint if they can't shoot back. Disarmament has always been the aim of every government that sought total power over the People. Historically, this has almost always led to mass murder or genocide at the hands of corrupt, criminal government.
Self defense is a DIVINE right
The right to protect your person, your children and your family is a divine right, granted in alignment with the principles of our Creator. We see self defense reflected throughout nature, from the spines on a cactus plant to the ability of nearly every plant or animal to fight back against predators that would cause it harm.
The United Nations, which is an evil, destructive force of global domination, does not recognize the fundamental human right of self defense. Instead, it pursues a philosophy of a "monopoly of violence" in the hands of world governments.
The United Nations, in other words, is not truly "anti-gun," it simply wants all the guns in the hands of government workers and none of the guns in the hands of the people.
Remember this about gun control: No government seeks to eliminate ALL guns. It only seeks to monopolize the guns in the hands of government and thereby create a so-called "monopoly of violence" to be used against the People.
You don't hear governments, for example, say they're going to disarm all their police, disarm the FBI, disarm the ATF and disarm the military. That would be "disarmament" if really true. No, what they propose is selectively disarming only the public while concentrating the "monopoly of violence" in the hands of the government.
This creates a dangerous imbalance of power, especially given that cities and states are sharply cutting back on law enforcement budgets due to increasing debt. The police simply can't protect private citizens from violence, and the recent shooting in Aurora, Colorado absolutely proves it. Let there be no doubt that dialing 911 and screaming for help does about as much good as crossing your fingers and wishing for a magical genie to appear and take out the bad guy.
But we don't need magical genies to do that job. We already have millions of law-abiding citizens all across the country who responsibly carry concealed weapons, acting as a powerful deterrent to outbreaks of violence. Those citizens pass background checks, they get fingerprinted, they must pass training courses to show competency in handling firearms. But citizens who can stop crime are not welcomed in Aurora, Colorado!
Because stopping a massacre in Aurora is a crime!
Aurora, the city of surrender to violent crime
Aurora, Colorado should rename itself "the city of surrender" to violent crime. Welcome to Aurora! Disarm yourself and prepare to be shot, because even though you're not allowed to protect yourself, our police force is so thin and spread out that we can't protect you either. Good luck!
Mass shootings CAN be stopped. They can be stopped by private citizens working with the same aims as peace officers: to stop the violence immediately, thereby saving lives.
It is astonishing that cities like Aurora, Colorado do not allow citizens to protect themselves against violence. The deaths of those 12 victims rest squarely on the officials of the city of Aurora who deliberately created an environment of total helplessness that directly led to the unnecessary deaths of innocent people, including young women and children.
City and state officials of Colorado are, in my view, negligent in these deaths and should be sued by the families of the survivors for criminalizing self defense. Shame on these officials! Shame of those who demand that we all become victims of violent crime. Shame on those who call for yet more disarmament of the public which will inevitably lead to yet more violent crime that can't be stopped.
Think about these FACTS for a second
The massacre in Aurora took only two minutes to carry out.
The average response time of police is, at minimum, six minutes (and getting worse).
A typical concealed carry holder can draw, aim and shoot back in less than five seconds.
Do the math.
Jap, če bi se vse grožnje z 4chana in 9gaga uresničle bi blo že 90% populacije mrtve :D
Sam najbrž bistveno težje kot tako kot če bi kupoval kruh. Največja težava ZDA je orožje in ničesar drugega. Sam oni se o tem ne sprašujejo. Če se men strga bom vzel pač orožje ki mi je pri roki. Dvomim da bi se drkal s tem da bi kupoval naokol orožje.
Mislim tip je očitno bil zelo brihten in delaven, zagoni pol lajfa za knjigami in potem bum...
W T F!
http://www.thegic.org/video/shocking-california-cops-open-fire-on-men-women-children-babies#ixzz21MWnmQOl
Taj interni teroristički čin izveden je sa bombom od umjetnog
gnojiva i kerozina....sastojaka koji se mogu legalno kupiti u
bilo kojoj zemlji....zato priča o kontroli oružja jednostavno ne stoji
jer se ovakvi napadi događaju i u zemljama sa vrlo strogim
zakonima o oružju i nemoguče je zaustaviti visoko motivirane
pojedince(luđake) da izvedu ovakve napade u slobodnom društvu
To je cijena slobode....koliko god ovo bio tragičan događaj.
Lista takih morilcev v Evropi (iz katere je razvidno, da so takšni poboji kar nekaj "običajnega"):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ram
page_killers:_Europe
in iz celega sveta, razdeljeno tudi po različnih vzrokih:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ram
page_killers
Če bi ga posedoval ilegalno, potem bi lahko zagovorniki orožja v ZDA enostavno rekli, da ni težava v orožju, temveč da je pač nekdo zgolj prekršil zakon o nakupu orožja. In da torej z zakoni o nošnji orožja ni nič narobe in ni treba ničesar spreminjati. In bi bila zgodba zaključena.
Ker pa ga je posedoval povsem legalno, jim to vzame ta argument. To je dobro za nasprotnike orožja v ZDA. Ker lahko rečejo, da so v tem primeru bili spoštovani vsi zakoni o nakupu orožja, pa se je tragedija vseeno zgodila. Torej lahko s tem argumentirajo, da je treba pravico o nošnji orožja zakonsko bolj omejiti, kot je slučaj sedaj. In taka argumentacija se bo gotovo v naslednjih mesecih tudi zgodila. Vprašanje pa je, če bo uspešna.
Ameriška družba je glede nošnje orožja razdeljena. Obstaja vpliven orožarski lobij, pa tudi ogromno ljudi, ki so proti orožju -- in ki so v bistvu prisiljeni živeti v takem sistemu.
http://slo-kronika.si/novice/dvanajst-zrtev-pokola-v-koloradu-kdo-so-oni/
a_shooting#Suspect) . Meni to novinarsko napihovanje in te neslane šale ni všeč, ker psihopatu dajejo tisto, kar hoče: pozornost(isto kot z Breivikom, ki je s svojim dejanjem naredil reklamo svojemu gibanju in verjetno dobil dodatne podpornike, ki jih je to dejanje fasciniralo). Lahko, da je to storil le zaradi pozornosti, kar je pa žalostno ... Problem je pa, da se taki ljudje izolirajo od družbe in ne dobijo ustrezne psihološke pomoči.
Model je imel na sebi specialni vojaški neprebojni jopič, tako kavbojsko streljanje bi povzročilo samo še večji masaker in še več žrtev.
težje bi prišel do njega. Zdaj lahko šamjzer kupiš enako kot kruh.
Poglejmo malo po Evropi. V zadnjih nekaj letih je bilo kar precej takih morilskih pohodov, iz glave se spomnim Francije, Belgije, Nemčije, Norveške, Švedske, Finske trikrat,... Ljudje smo pač... ljudje.
Tako je, njegova varnost je najpomembnejša!
Ker so mladi danes več ali manj prepuščenisami sebi in lepotam in grozotam interneta (ki je le odsev korporativnih medijev), na oblikovanje njihove osebnosti najbolj vplivajo prav ti mediji. Cerkev je uradno pokvarjena in pohlepna, v šolah pa ni nobene vzgoje duha; tam se vzgaja črede nekritičnih potrošnikov, ki pa se znajo na pamet naučiti cele knjige. Korporativni mediji pa nas ves čas subliminalno/ podzavestno učijo, kaj je dobro/ slabo, normalno/ obskurno ... Ker pa je v ZDA večina produkcije pod vplivom kapitala, ta skrbno izbira filme in teme, ki le podpirajo stanje stvari, ki jim odgovarja, mi pa skozi blišč in nasilje ameriških blokbasterjev kot gobe nevede vpijamo njihove vrednote - skratka, prek mehke moči, blišča filmskih zvezd in spolirane produkcije, ki jo lahko razumejo desetletni otroci, nas programirajo v državljane novega svetovnega reda (ki se nam je seveda že zgodil - s klikom miške lahko zdaj kupujejo podjetja od Šangaja do Nju Jorka)
V tem primeru, pa je holivud s svojim umotvorom Batman več kot očitno kriv za pomor ljudi, a holivuda nihče ne krivi - tam živijo lep oblečeni in nasmejani igralci in režiserji, oni že niso krivi - a so krivi prav oni, svojo degenerirano produkcijo, ki propagira nasilje in grabljenje denarja in slave za vsako ceno.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMZGGQ0E
Rk&feature=share
Tip je bil odličnjak, na dobri poti k doktoratu, v odlično plačanem poklicu. Namesto, da bi končal doktorat in preživel udobno življenje, v katerem bi za dober denar zdravil ljudi, se je raje odločil, da bo izvedel neko čudno predstavo, v kateri je pobil 12 nedolžnih nesrečnikov in jih še 50 ranil.
Kaj je narobe s to družbo, da je prignala tega človeka, da se je odločil za tako dejanje? O tem je resnično treba dobro razmisliti in zadevo raziskati, saj bomo le tako v prihodnje lahko preprečili podobne tragedije.
Napadalec ni bil oblečen kot Batman. Ne razumem, kaj naj bi bilo predrzno v tem, da bi otroke obiskal igralec oblečen v Batmana.
2. komentar po vrsti
Kasbi Poupkov · Top Commenter · Haward La sur le Canape
"no they need to send the jocker dress[ed] as an nurs[e] and blow up the hosplital so children will know that life is a bitch :)
Očitno mišljeno kot šala. Če si preveč občutljiv, bi bilo mogoče bolje, da se ne podaš v divjino interneta.
>Alex Vasiliu · Top Commenter
>That would finish them off. [Model si drzne imeti sliko jokerja! Brez kakršne koli ljubezni do sočloveka. Problem je, da se te ljudje istovetijo s sociopatskimi antiheroji (to se je zgodilo tudi morilcu), saj jih filmi prikazujejo z določenimi lastnostimi, ki jih nekateri]
>Reply · 16 · · Friday at 4:09pm
Kaj je narobe z sliko Jokerja? Heath Ledger je odlično odigral to vlogo in je en po mojem skromnem mnenju najboljših likov v taki zvrsti filmov vseh časov.
http://9gag.com/gag/4826541
Ismail Kassabi · Top Commenter · Marrakech
"Who gives a fuck...they're dead so fucking what? it's not our fault, we don't have to be sorry"
Če že navajamo, dajmo navest še odgovore na ta komentar:
- Okay, let's not get too carried away here. Lives were still lost, so at least show some respect or just don't say anything at all.
- @Ismail ... Your logic = faith in humanity lost
- Ismail Kassabi so.. you're a fucking asshole..
- Ismail Kassabi You are totatally right, ppl dies everyday just on differents way, nothing to be sorry about
- Ismail Kassabi we don't but we live in a society where if one does not follow their rules we are out casted and eventually become forever alone so either get used to it or suicide. plus its just ruse to not give those people some respect.
(kopiral sem samo komentarje, ki se nanašajo na tisto izjavo)
Od 4 komentarjev mu trije nasprotujejo (eni bolj, drugi manj) četrti komentar (tretji po vrsti) bi se pa dalo brat kot sarkazem.
Plus Ismail ni podpiral teh pobojev, je samo trdil, da se nam ni treba čutiti odgovorne za te smrti. Torej ni podpiral nasilja.
>saj jih filmi prikazujejo z določenimi lastnostimi, ki jih nekateri
Hotel sem povedati, da je je Joker v tem filmu bil prikazan z raznimi lastnosti, ki so delno pozitivne (večina zlobnežev je pametnih, odločnih, iznajdljivih, so do neke mere zabavni za s svojim črnim humorjem)in skrivnoste ter lahko fascinirajo sociopata (večina zlobnežev je samih sociopatov, na žalost). Morilec se je z Jokerjem verjetno enačil, ker je bil sam do enek mere inteligenten, vendar je njegovo dojemanje sveta zamglejno s fantazijo in čustvena inteligenca na ničli. Preveliko konzumiranje istihmedijev lahko človeka zastrupi in mu onemogoči racionalno mišljenje.
vsako izgubljeno človeško življenje je tragedija. Kjerkoli,
Kdu je pa joku za familijo v Afganistanu, katero je pobil crazy yankee soldier. Kolk jih je bilo 16, 17, ne vem tocno? RTVSLO pa je temu seveda posvetila minimalko casa in prostora. Nc kej velik medij ni ta RTV. Samo prepisovanje in prevajanje clankov dveh ali treh prozahodnih medijev.
Zdajle sem šel pogledati na vaš famozni 9gag in sem takoj našel večje število komentarjev, ki skoraj PODPIRAJO ta masaker in kažejo splošno neizobraženost, zatrtost in nič socialne inteligence!
Dokazi:
I.
http://9gag.com/gag/4820380 [Slika vsebuje idejo, da bi tiste travmatizirane otroke obiskal Batman! Že to je predrzno do skrajnosti!]
I.I
2. komentar po vrsti
Kasbi Poupkov · Top Commenter · Haward La sur le Canape
"no they need to send the jocker dress[ed] as an nurs[e] and blow up the hosplital so children will know that life is a bitch :)
"
870 LAJKOV!
I.II.
Zadnja grupa kometarjev
Jasmin Fyona · Top Commenter · Harvard University
Are the Joker dressed up as a nurse...
Reply · 18 · · Friday at 4:08pm
>Alex Vasiliu · Top Commenter
>That would finish them off. [Model si drzne imeti sliko jokerja! Brez kakršne koli ljubezni do sočloveka. Problem je, da se te ljudje istovetijo s sociopatskimi antiheroji (to se je zgodilo tudi morilcu), saj jih filmi prikazujejo z določenimi lastnostimi, ki jih nekateri]
>Reply · 16 · · Friday at 4:09pm
>Audrian Antonio Avila · Top Commenter
>Such and horrible idea
>Reply · 4 · · Friday at 5:06pm
II.
http://9gag.com/gag/4826541
Ismail Kassabi · Top Commenter · Marrakech
"Who gives a fuck...they're dead so fucking what? it's not our fault, we don't have to be sorry
"[odgovor na opazko, da je to neprimerno po tem masakru]
IN ŠE BI LAHKO NAŠTEVAL!
Ko še bolj gledam tale 9gag vidim vse posledice zahodne družbe na psihi ljudi! Skoraj vse teme tukaj imajo potencial da sprovocirajo ljudi s homocidnimi in suicidnimi nazori, asocialne ljudi (polovica tem se ukvarja s seksulano in ljubezensko problematiko, kar lahko dokončno sprovocira psihopate, ki nimajo partnerja in na tej strani dobivajo napačne informacije in satiro njihovih problemov. Nekateri ljudje na žalost nimajo dovolj socialne inteligence, da bi razumeli to satiro in jim to še bolj zmede čustvene in družbene odnose)Mediji pravzaprav podžigajo psihopate! 9gag je gojišče sociopatov in seksulano zafrustriranih ljudi! )gag je višek zahodne kulture - teli posti o batmanu in raznih filmi so le reklama in nažalost te reklame, "višek zahodne kulture", proizvajajo čustveno nestabilne ljudi!
Te filmi ter ta satira je tovarna psihopatov, ki so kot tempirane bombe!
Z vsem spoštovanjem do družin umrlih. Če bi žaloval za usemi umrlimi na svetu bi lahko delal samo to. Ampak še vedno..rabimo orožje rabimo vojsko .... najbol čustvena ljubeča bitja na zemlji ki uporabljajo orožje samo zato ker mu ga porinejo v roke in jih prepričajo da je nekdo njegov sovražnik.
Razlika je v tem da v N času lahko z nožem pobiješ bistveno manj ljudi kot z avtomatskim orožjem. Orožje v prosti prodaji med hruškami in bananami lajša delo psihopatom in zločincem.
Treba je imet zgodbe v katerih se boto ljudje pogovarjali in razmišljali.
Trenutno ceu svet gleda samo to kaj se je zgodilo v aurori ..lepo vas prosim ljudje se pobijajo in umirajo iz dneva v dan.
Že od leta 2001 so Američani v stalni nevarnosti pred terorosti, mediji ljudi strašijo pred vročino, pred mrazom, pred Arabci, pred Evropejci, pred Kitajci, pred borznimi mešetarji, bančniki, delavci, Mehičani, kačami, pajki, krokodili, .........
Če te mediji vsak dan šopajo s tem, da si v nevarnosti, če neprestano svarijo pred katastrofami, ni čudno, da se nekomu vtrga, ter si naredi kakšno teorijo, po kateri bodo na premieri filma imeli tajno srečanje pripadniki neke organizacije, ki se je odločila podrediti svet.....
Sicer pa tudi naši mediji vedno bolj kopirajo ameriške in poročajo samo še o katastrofah.
Čeprav je treba reči, da so recimo grozne poplave med monsunskim deževjem za kolega iz Bangladeša nekaj čisto normalnega, ter mu ni jasno, zakaj o tem vsakoletnem vremenskem ciklusu poročajo na televiziji.....
SLIKA1
SLIKA2
Pics or it didn't happen!
Naj bi bil
Na 9gagu še nisem videl spoilerjev za tega Batmana... torej so tvoje trditve že na majavih tleh. Na 9gagu tudi še nisem videl, da bi kdo podpiral nasilje... razen seveda, če je tisto nasilje očitno bilo mišljeno kot kakšna satira, sarkazem ali kaj podobnega. Če bi kdo napisal, da bo pobil vse na premieri, bi naletel na hudo nasprotovanje ostalih uporabnikov.
Še eno vprašanje... Da se prijaviš na 9gag moraš imeti fb account kajne? In moraš se prijaviti, če hočeš komentirat ali glasovat... Je pa v novici lepo navedeno, da ta človek ni imel ne fb ne twitterja...
Tvoje trditve so polne lukenj.
Takšni so najmanj sumljivi v idiotskem sistemu šmekerstva!
Verjetno vas je veliko takih, ki bi o kakem svoje sosedu iz bloka lahko povedali le, da se drži sam zase in da deluje prijazen.
When we initially heard the rumor that one of our users may have been involved, we did an immediate and thorough search of the site and found absolutely zero evidence that any of the alleged posts ever appeared on 9GAG.
Kar je seveda laž in sramotno, da se zdaj skrivajo, ko bi lahko preprečili tole grozo.
Inteligenca ne izključuje slabega duševnega stanja. Po moje je bolje, če diagnozo prepustiš ekspertom.
Obrazloži prosim. Kako bi lahko stran namenjena razvedrilu lahko preprečila masakr?